Scientific Education About Sexy Time Is A Human Right, Not A Moral Platform Featured

Written by 
Scientific Education About Sexy Time Is A Human Right, Not A Moral Platform

Most people in the UK will equate sex education with rolling flavoured condoms onto multi-ethnic plastic penises, whilst giggling uncontrollably. If you’re school was sh*t enough, you may have used bananas. My condolences. If you have not since actually seen a penis, I would like to reassure any doubts and confirm that penises are not yellow and pieces of fruit. They are penises. Handle with care.

New reports indicate a worry that sex education in Britain is being ‘watered down’, with organisations claiming new guidelines mean that it will omit references to genitalia, puberty or sexual health. Then some people said that this will not even remotely be the case. Hmm. DISCUSSION.

This is all against a backdrop of a survey that revealed a worryingly low percentage of UK teenagers (13%) had said they learnt most about sex from a Sex and Relationships Education teacher at school. 36% said they had gleaned the majority of their sexual factoids from friends, and 10% got the dirty deets from boyfriends and girlfriends. Bearing in mind that these are the same friends, boyfriends and girlfriends, of which only 13% got most of their information from  a reliable, scientific source, and of which the majority got their information from friends and boyfriends and girlfriends, who mostly got their information from friends and boyfriends and girlfriends… do you see where I’m going here?

Sex education is a human right, and everybody, regardless of their religion, gender, race or terrible music taste deserves to have the most up-to-date, scientifically-backed information (yes, even Mumford & Sons fans). That’s scientifically-backed, not morally-backed. Sex is a funny old thing, and rather than seeing it as a fun, morally-sound activity that many people like to enjoy, like going to the zoo or playing frisbee, people get in a right hissy fit about it. Honesty is generally the best policy, and surely sex should be openly and frankly discussed in the same way that we might discuss any other kind of risky behaviour.

Take America – certain religious groups seem hell-bent on pursuing their own moral dogma, rather than one that looks out for the best interests of students concerning sex education in schools. About 35% of schools require abstinence to be taught as the only option for unmarried people, and either disallow the discussion of contraception completely, or only highlight its ineffectiveness. Eh? This is made worse when put alongside research that shows that abstinence-only strategies may make sexually active teenagers less likely to use contraception, which of course increases their risk of unintended pregnancy and STDs.

This approach seems to have eluded a really, really core, vital piece of intellectual reasoning, the likes of which it has taken centuries of painstaking research and endless think-tanks to produce: young people like to have sex, and they are definitely going to do it whether you like it or not. Telling hormone-crazed teenagers not to have sex, at all, ever, until they are married, is preposterous, and then denying them the scientific education about STIs, contraception, pregnancy, sexual orientation, and  the importance of consent, is criminal. We are lucky to live in a world where this wealth of information exists, so we should take note, and stop robbing our youth blind.


Frances Black

Second year English and Philosophy student at Leeds Uni. I write for the Leeds Student newspaper and BounceSIN, and I'm a Leeds Student Radio presenter.I love music, gigs, reading, writing, travelling, trying to speak Spanish, and many other exciting activities.

Copyright Bounce Sin, 2011.Web design by Wrightway Digital, Maintained by BounceSIN Ltd.